Final Cut Pro X5215677

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 02:07, 5 января 2016; ChloecnpnuswgsiKosiorek (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Apple's recent discharge of [http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/member.php?action=viewpro&member=tulip3help Final Cut Pro X] has caused quite a bit of controversy…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Apple's recent discharge of Final Cut Pro X has caused quite a bit of controversy. Many additional features and speed improvements are already added, but a majority of more features are conspicuously missing. Further, this latest release just isn't backward appropriate for any previous versions. Why is it so various and what exactly is Apple's idea? Here's the inside track. Older versions of ultimate Cut Pro were built while using the Carbon application programming interface (API), which limited programs to 32-bit, thereby limiting available memory to 4GB. These days where base MacBook Pros feature 4GB of memory and dual-core, 64-bit processors, this is a serious limitation. Apple's latest API, called Cocoa, allows the utilization of 64-bit architecture, eliminating memory bottlenecks, which necessitated a whole rewrite of ultimate Cut Pro. Because FCPX is a complete rewrite using Cocoa, it's able to operate faster on current hardware and takes advantage of multi-core processors.


Just by the array of professional features conspicuously missing, FCPX was probably written primarily for speed with plans to add more features afterwards. It currently does not support OMF output, which is commonly used to import audio into ProTools for mixing, or Edit Decision List (EDL) data, a characteristic employed to move a job into another program for your finishing stage. Multi-cam support and output to tape, a format still used by lots of professionals, is additionally missing. Furthermore, there look like no offers to to produce new version of ultimate Cut Server, utilized to allow multiple users to work on a remotely-stored project simultaneously. Several video formats, including XDCAM and Red, usually do not yet have support; because of the complete rewrite, support for each video format needs to be completely rewritten. Updates adding missing features should begin to show up soon, but some professional video editors are, understandably, worried that they can be left from the lurch. Not everything about FCPX is detrimental news, though; Apple has added several new, user-friendly features for their favorite video production program. The app includes a new Magnetic Timeline feature, which groups audio, video and effects together and permits the designer to maneuver clips around without displacing any of the project. Additionally, FCPX has Content Auto-Analysis, which detects the existence of individuals it and identifies close, medium and wide-angle shots. Compressor 4, the encoding companion program for Final Cut Pro, adds additional export functions, live streaming support and streamlined library settings. Motion 5, FCPX's motion graphics companion, provides smart motion templates, parameter control and editable Final Cut Pro templates. FCPX will be the official replacing Pro 7, nonetheless it has also absorbed many options that come with other Final Cut Studio programs, effectively replacing the suite with one program. Compressor 4 and Motion 5 provide other features not provided by FCPX and is purchased for $49.99 each for the Mac App Store, Apple's desktop form of their groundbreaking mobile app platform. Retailing at $299.99 for the App Store, FCPX has additionally completely replaced Express, the individual version of Final Cut Pro. Formerly, Express was $200, with all the Pro version costing $1000. Because it is entirely on the App Store, users are able to buy the software once and handle the installation on any of their authorized computers. Apple's complete overhaul of ultimate Cut Pro has caused a serious stir, but it'll certainly be a while before all the options are added, so it's hard to draw an absolute conclusion so far. The removal of Express and the decrease in price apparently put it approximately a person and professional application. In spite of the deficiency of many features used by professional, Pro Express is apparently a great choice for somebody planning to start creating their unique videos, especially with the brand new user-friendly tools added by Apple.