Final Cut Pro X5996969

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 02:39, 5 января 2016; MarvishrwtraireqDuenas (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Apple's recent discharge of [http://www.relation-s.co.jp/userinfo.php?uid=1844835 Final Cut Pro X] has caused a lot of controversy. Many latest features and speed…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Apple's recent discharge of Final Cut Pro X has caused a lot of controversy. Many latest features and speed improvements have been added, but many more features are conspicuously missing. Further, this latest release is not backward suitable for any previous versions. Why is it so various and precisely what is Apple's game plan? Here's the scoop. Older versions of ultimate Cut Pro were built using the Carbon application programming interface (API), which limited programs to 32-bit, thereby limiting available memory to 4GB. In a time where base MacBook Pros include 4GB of memory and dual-core, 64-bit processors, this is a serious limitation. Apple's latest API, called Cocoa, enables the usage of 64-bit architecture, eliminating memory bottlenecks, which necessitated an entire rewrite of Final Cut Pro. Because FCPX is a complete rewrite using Cocoa, it's able to operate faster on current hardware and uses multi-core processors.


Judging by the variety of professional features conspicuously missing, FCPX was probably written primarily for speed with intends to combine features at a later date. It currently doesn't support OMF output, which is commonly used to import audio into ProTools for mixing, or Edit Decision List (EDL) data, a characteristic employed to move a task into another program for the finishing stage. Multi-cam support and output to tape, a format still employed by professionals, can be missing. Furthermore, there look like no intends to to produce new version of Final Cut Server, that is utilized to permit multiple users to work over a remotely-stored project simultaneously. Several video formats, including XDCAM and Red, tend not to yet have support; due to complete rewrite, support for each and every video format must be completely rewritten. Updates adding missing features should begin to show up soon, but some professional video editors are, understandably, worried that they'll be left from the lurch. Not everything about FCPX isn't good news, though; Apple has added several new, user-friendly features with their favorite video production program. The app includes a new Magnetic Timeline feature, which groups audio, video and effects together and enables the designer to advance clips around without displacing the project. Additionally, FCPX has Content Auto-Analysis, which detects a good folks the video and identifies close, medium and wide-angle shots. Compressor 4, the encoding companion program for Final Cut Pro, adds additional export functions, live streaming support and streamlined library settings. Motion 5, FCPX's motion graphics companion, provides smart motion templates, parameter control and editable Final Cut Pro templates. FCPX is the official replacing of Pro 7, however it in addition has absorbed many features of other Final Cut Studio programs, effectively replacing the suite with one program. Compressor 4 and Motion 5 provide more features not provided by FCPX and is purchased for $49.99 each on the Mac App Store, Apple's desktop type of their groundbreaking mobile app platform. Retailing at $299.99 on the App Store, FCPX has completely replaced Express, the individual version of Final Cut Pro. Formerly, Express was $200, together with the Pro version costing $1000. Because it is entirely on the App Store, users are able to buy the software once and handle the installation on any one of their authorized computers. Apple's complete overhaul of Final Cut Pro is mainly responsible for a good stir, but it'll certainly be a while prior to the options are added, so it will be hard to draw a definite conclusion to date. The reduction of Express as well as the reduction of price seem to place it somewhere between a person and professional application. Inspite of the insufficient many features utilised by professional, Pro Express appears to be a good option for a person looking to start creating their particular videos, particularly with the new user-friendly tools added by Apple.