Final Cut Pro X9889614

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 02:40, 5 января 2016; SalomeepylzbbsubEstrela (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Apple's recent release of [http://www.rtexcel.com/story.php?title=fcpx-effects Final Cut Pro X] has caused a substantial amount of controversy. Many extra feature…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Apple's recent release of Final Cut Pro X has caused a substantial amount of controversy. Many extra features and speed improvements have been added, but some more features are conspicuously missing. Further, this latest release is not backward compatible with any previous versions. Why do so different and precisely what is Apple's plan? Here's the inside track. Older versions of Final Cut Pro were built while using Carbon application programming interface (API), which limited programs to 32-bit, thereby limiting available memory to 4GB. Activities like the where base MacBook Pros feature 4GB of memory and dual-core, 64-bit processors, that is the serious limitation. Apple's latest API, called Cocoa, allows the use of 64-bit architecture, eliminating memory bottlenecks, which necessitated a total rewrite of Final Cut Pro. Because FCPX is a complete rewrite using Cocoa, it's in a position to operate considerably quicker on current hardware and uses multi-core processors.


By the array of professional features conspicuously missing, FCPX was probably written primarily for speed with intends to combine features later on. It currently does not support OMF output, that's commonly used to import audio into ProTools for mixing, or Edit Decision List (EDL) data, a feature utilized to move an undertaking into another program to the finishing stage. Multi-cam support and output to tape, a format still used by lots of professionals, can also be missing. Furthermore, there seem to be no plans to to push out a new edition of ultimate Cut Server, utilized to allow for multiple users to function on a remotely-stored project simultaneously. Several video formats, including XDCAM and Red, tend not to yet have support; due to complete rewrite, support for every video format should be completely rewritten. Updates adding missing features should begin to show up soon, however, many professional video editors are, understandably, worried that they're going to stay in the lurch. Not everything about FCPX is detrimental news, though; Apple has added several new, user-friendly features with their favorite video production program. The app includes a new Magnetic Timeline feature, which groups audio, video and effects together and allows the designer to go clips around without displacing some of the project. Additionally, FCPX has Content Auto-Analysis, which detects the use of people the playback quality and identifies close, medium and wide-angle shots. Compressor 4, the encoding companion program for Final Cut Pro, adds additional export functions, live streaming support and streamlined library settings. Motion 5, FCPX's motion graphics companion, provides smart motion templates, parameter control and editable Final Cut Pro templates. FCPX may be the official replacing of Pro 7, nevertheless it has absorbed many features of other Final Cut Studio programs, effectively replacing the suite with one program. Compressor 4 and Motion 5 provide additional features not given by FCPX and is purchased for $49.99 each for the Mac App Store, Apple's desktop form of their groundbreaking mobile app platform. Retailing at $299.99 around the App Store, FCPX in addition has completely replaced Express, the consumer sort of Final Cut Pro. Formerly, Express was $200, using the Pro version costing $1000. Because it is entirely on the App Store, users will be able to pick the software once and install it on any of their authorized computers. Apple's complete overhaul of ultimate Cut Pro is mainly responsible for a good stir, however it will be a while prior to the features are added, therefore it is hard to draw an obvious conclusion thus far. The reduction of Express and the reduction of price appear to place it anywhere between a person and professional application. In spite of the lack of many features used by professional, Pro Express is apparently a good option for an individual attempting to start creating their particular videos, especially with the modern user-friendly tools added by Apple.