Final Cut Pro X9881284

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 02:42, 5 января 2016; IrvinmqshzqjlicSchaufelberge (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Apple's recent release of [http://jrbatidos.com//story.php?title=fcpx-plugins-2 FCPX Effects] has resulted in a substantial amount of controversy. Many latest fea…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Apple's recent release of FCPX Effects has resulted in a substantial amount of controversy. Many latest features and speed improvements are already added, but a majority of more features are conspicuously missing. Further, this latest release isn't backward works with any previous versions. How come it's so different and what exactly is Apple's game plan? Here's the inside track. Older versions of ultimate Cut Pro were built while using Carbon application programming interface (API), which limited programs to 32-bit, thereby limiting available memory to 4GB. These days where base MacBook Pros feature 4GB of memory and dual-core, 64-bit processors, that is the serious limitation. Apple's latest API, called Cocoa, enables the use of 64-bit architecture, eliminating memory bottlenecks, which necessitated an entire rewrite of Final Cut Pro. Because FCPX is often a complete rewrite using Cocoa, it's able to operate considerably quicker on current hardware and uses multi-core processors.


Judging by the variety of professional features conspicuously missing, FCPX was probably written primarily for speed with intends to add more features down the road. It currently doesn't support OMF output, that is widely used to import audio into ProTools for mixing, or Edit Decision List (EDL) data, a characteristic employed to move a task into another program for the finishing stage. Multi-cam support and output to tape, a format still used by lots of professionals, can also be missing. Furthermore, there appear to be no promises to to produce new edition of ultimate Cut Server, which is often used allowing multiple users to work over a remotely-stored project simultaneously. Several video formats, including XDCAM and Red, do not yet have support; as a result of complete rewrite, support for each video format must be completely rewritten. Updates adding missing features should begin to show up soon, but a majority of professional video editors are, understandably, worried that they'll be left in the lurch. Not everything about FCPX is bad news, though; Apple has added several new, user-friendly features to their favorite video production program. The app carries a new Magnetic Timeline feature, which groups audio, video and effects together and allows the designer to go clips around without displacing some of the project. Additionally, FCPX has Content Auto-Analysis, which detects a good individuals it and identifies close, medium and wide-angle shots. Compressor 4, the encoding companion program for Final Cut Pro, adds additional export functions, live streaming support and streamlined library settings. Motion 5, FCPX's motion graphics companion, provides smart motion templates, parameter control and editable Final Cut Pro templates. FCPX may be the official replacing Pro 7, nevertheless it has additionally absorbed many popular features of other Final Cut Studio programs, effectively replacing the suite with one program. Compressor 4 and Motion 5 provide other functions not provided by FCPX and can be purchased for $49.99 each about the Mac App Store, Apple's desktop sort of their groundbreaking mobile app platform. Retailing at $299.99 for the App Store, FCPX has additionally completely replaced Express, the customer type of Final Cut Pro. Formerly, Express was $200, with the Pro version costing $1000. As it's available on the App Store, users should be able to choose the software once and handle the installation on some of their authorized computers. Apple's complete overhaul of Final Cut Pro has resulted in a good stir, but it will certainly be a while before all the functions are added, so it's difficult to draw a certain conclusion to date. The reduction of Express as well as the reduction of price seem to use it anywhere between a person and professional application. Regardless of the lack of many features utilised by professional, Pro Express appears to be an excellent choice for someone looking to start creating their particular videos, especially with the newest user-friendly tools added by Apple.