FireAdamHill383050

Who`s DumpAdamHill2016? Can it be Cal Coast "News"? (It's obviously their only allegation source.) Can it be an angry conservative radio host? Is it a challenger running for Adam Hill's seat around the SLO Board of Supervisors? Is it an over-paid political consultant justifying their fee by beating dead and disproved horses? Should it be a hyper-partisan self-promoter who wishes to stay relevant by using relentlessly pointing on the same, single attack piece until the ice caps melt? We don't know. I am not sure. Because is obviously the case with folks this way, they throw out an accusation, then run and hide in order that they cannot be cross-examined. It is exactly what they are doing. Believe that it makes them smart. Believe that celebrate them strong.

It does not take strut of insecurity. It's the ploy of your snake oil salesman. ... or perhaps oahu is the Internet Conspiracist Community same as posing with an AR-15 and looking to take a look "bad-ass" for your camera. They hide behind machines to reduce off all debate. Whether a person hides behind a gun or moniker online, it is the same mentality: they're afraid of a true debate because they know they'll lose. I, however, tend not to hide. We are Paul from poliARC. I'm a politically-incorrect-liberal-nobody who thinks grammar is a ruse. You will find, Furthermore, i do web and print design help Supervisor Adam Hill. While doing that work I stumbled upon this "DumpAdamHill2016" video on-line, and remarked that not simply is the staging and content shameful fibbery, nevertheless they didn't register the domain they put in their own personal pseudo PAC ad. (As of 12/14/2015, the "committee" isn't registered anywhere I really could identify, either.) So I bought the domain and posted this little public shaming rant about the off-chance it may be read before they pull down the video or alter the name. I'm doing this by myself dime as a SLO County resident driven by the principle of the issue. Such as the vast majority of those who are in America, I'm fed up with the "truth is optional" crowd managing the dialog when all they do is create problems and sledgehammer our body in to a junior high bet on I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I while they shout "LALALALALA" with hands covering their ears whenever facts scale the walls of the well-padded digital playground. This is not about whether someone supports a politician or otherwise not. My employed by Hill does not matter concise (of course, I doubt these folks should be able to embrace that idea... they're more the clutching type2). I'm referencing the whole process of modern right-wing dissension and community interaction. This really is about how precisely people who shout the loudest and point fingers probably the most do this while hiding in online burrows, or while crouched in fact-blocking bunkers of bravado-buttressed belief. Their contribution to political dialog could be the equivalent of teenage boys spraypainting YOU SUCK over a locker and giggling their in the past to the comment section clubhouse, pining for the thumbs up as whether it were a centerfold. I don't care if you'd prefer or hate Adam Hill. I care that you just throw outlandish claims from behind a mask. And to anyone whose default rebuttal argument against anything with which you disagree is, "Biassed!": you need to be shaming these people too. If you opt to not listen to me because you think I'm biased... you then can't listen to FireAdamHill.com either. We all know nothing concerning this person except their crass bias against Adam Hill. Thumbs down for cowardice. To DumpAdamHill2016, an invitation: it is time to stop hiding behind handles and aliases. Step away from echo chamber. This is simply not some national campaign: you know one another for crying out loud! Tiny pond! (Only a few fish.) Everybody knows this can be either the riled-up, self-declared foe who used exactly the same name-based SEO tactics last election, or perhaps the steadfast group in SLO County who've had fire Adam Hill within their sights for a long time. All that bottled-up anger sourced through the vine planted the afternoon he muted a microphone... ...because (like the rest of us) he felt it had been no more socially acceptable to subject The People towards the off-topic, outlandish and frequently abusive rantings throughout a BOS public comment. A democrat finally took a stand from the Noise on that day, and boy howdy that cause you to be angry... it made Adam Hill your white whale. And you have hunted him from the time. If you aren't this stubborn group who would rather hate: set the record straight and reveal your name. I welcome being wrong, and i also love a good debate, but I'm darn tired of masked accusations manufactured by people they cannot sign their very own name into a claim... ...for damn sick and tired with always being right.