The significance of Syrian Conflict524324

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:07, 10 марта 2016; JoettegaftjerymbHermansen (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Through the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces as well as the rebel army it could are already observed that "Syrian conflict" became…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Through the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces as well as the rebel army it could are already observed that "Syrian conflict" became one of the very crucial cases for that world. Both Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama have made their points in showing that it is inside their countries interests to do something. Therefore, it poses the issue why the problem in Syria is really important for Russia as well as the U . s ..


Firstly, it's worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It has usage of Med which is in the Middle of four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The first a pair of them have hostile relations especially underneath the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is located between those countries and Iran is their strongest ally in the centre East, that make them a really strategically located country. The very last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near Syria. The most important thing, is that destabilization of Syria as well as the many Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly make up the rebel army) could possibly have impact on situation in those regions (Kuwait - that is vitally important because it continues to be your fourth biggest oil exporter for the USA in last 20 years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, who have already causing problems as a result of activity of their extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization and increase of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, who are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic interest in the guts east) are extremely interested in the syrian crisis charity. Barack Obama feels a lot of pressure through the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government which is supporting the rebel army in the first place), who emphasize the threat of Iran for the complete Middle East. The 2nd, important aspect could be the power over the Mediterranean Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Ussr and Syrian governments might be basically named since the only opposition to USA/NATO domination on the Mediterranean and beyond. In case there is failure of Bashar Al-Assad, a good Russian base might be put under question by the new government. Additionally, Putin would loss his only ally within the Middle-east region and what's more, a return provider as Russia may be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Barack Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries and thus feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria might be described not only as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but additionally as a conflict in the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure from the Syrian conflict will definitely have major affect both relations between Russia and USA and the future of the center East.