The value of Syrian Conflict1199031

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:10, 10 марта 2016; VincentmtuvlpvybjPius (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Throughout the ongoing conflict in Syria between the Bashar Al-Assad forces and also the rebel army it may are already observed that "Syrian conflict" became one…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Throughout the ongoing conflict in Syria between the Bashar Al-Assad forces and also the rebel army it may are already observed that "Syrian conflict" became one of the very most crucial cases for your world. Both Vladimir Putin and Obama have made their points in showing that it's within their countries interests to act. Therefore, it poses the question why the specific situation in Syria is really important for Russia and the U . s ..


Firstly, it is worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It has access to Med and is during four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The initial two of them have hostile relations and especially under the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria can be found between those countries and Iran is their strongest ally at the center East, that make them an extremely strategically located country. The very last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near to Syria. What's important, is always that destabilization of Syria and the large number of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly from the rebel army) could have impact on situation in those regions (Kuwait - that is essential mainly because it has been the final biggest oil exporter to the USA in last fifteen years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, that have already causing problems as a result of activity of their extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization while increasing of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, who are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic interest in the Middle east) can be extremely concerned about the syrian refugees charity. Obama feels a lot of pressure from the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government which can be supporting the rebel army right away), who emphasize the threat of Iran for the whole Middle East. The other, very essential aspect may be the power over the med Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Soviet Union and Syrian governments could be basically named because the only opposition to USA/NATO domination in the Med. In the case of failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the use of Russian base may be put under question by the new government. In addition, Putin would loss his only ally inside the Middle-east region what is actually more, a return provider as Russia may be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Barack Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries thereby feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria might be described not only as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but also like a conflict on the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure with the Syrian conflict will definitely have major influence on both relations between Russia and USA and the desolate man the Middle East.