The significance of Syrian Conflict6176770

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:24, 10 марта 2016; BereniceiojzzjizqoMccamish (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «During the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces along with the rebel army it could have been observed that "Syrian conflict" became on…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

During the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces along with the rebel army it could have been observed that "Syrian conflict" became one of the extremely crucial cases for that world. Both Vladimir Putin and Obama make their points in showing it is inside their countries interests to do something. Therefore, it poses the question why your situation in Syria is really necessary for Russia and also the Usa.


Firstly, it's worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It has access to Med and is during four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The 1st a pair of them have hostile relations especially underneath the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is situated between those countries and Iran is strongest ally in the Middle East, which can make them an extremely situated near commercial establishments country. The last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near to Syria. What's important, is destabilization of Syria and the large numbers of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly from the rebel army) may have effect on situation in those regions (Kuwait - that is extremely important mainly because it continues to be the final biggest oil exporter for that USA in last 20 years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, that have already causing problems due to activity of their extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization and increase of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, who are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic interest in the very center east) are really concerned about the syrian refugees charity. Obama feels a lot of pressure from your Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government which can be supporting the rebel army in the first place), who emphasize the specter of Iran for your Middle East. The other, essential aspect could be the power over the Mediterranean Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Ussr and Syrian governments may be basically named as the only opposition to USA/NATO domination within the Mediterranean and beyond. In the event of failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the existence of Russian base might be put under question from the new government. Moreover, Putin would loss his only ally within the Middle-east region and what's more, an income provider as Russia may be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Barack Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries and so feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria might be described not just as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but also being a conflict over the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure from the Syrian conflict will surely have major influence on both relations between Russia and USA as well as the way ahead for the center East.