The significance of Syrian Conflict3052652

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:24, 10 марта 2016; MiguelwoflmdeeavLeyh (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «In the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces as well as the rebel army it may have been observed that "Syrian conflict" became one of t…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

In the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces as well as the rebel army it may have been observed that "Syrian conflict" became one of the very crucial cases for your world. Both Vladimir Putin and Obama are making their points in showing that it is inside their countries interests some thing. Therefore, it poses the issue why the situation in Syria is so important for Russia as well as the United states.


Firstly, it's worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It has usage of Mediterranean and beyond and is also in the heart of four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The very first a couple of them have hostile relations and especially underneath the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is situated between those countries and Iran is the strongest ally at the center East, which can make them a really situated near commercial establishments country. The last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near Syria. What's important, is that destabilization of Syria and the great number of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly constitute the rebel army) might have impact on situation in those regions (Kuwait - which can be extremely important because it may be the final biggest oil exporter to the USA in last fifteen years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, who have already causing problems because of the activity of the company's extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization and increase of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, who're actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic curiosity about the Middle east) can be extremely concerned with the help syria. Barack Obama feels a lot of pressure from the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government which is supporting the rebel army in the first place), who emphasize the specter of Iran for the whole Middle East. The other, very important aspect is the power over the Mediterranean Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Ussr and Syrian governments can be basically named because the only opposition to USA/NATO domination within the Med. In case there is failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the existence of Russian base could possibly be put under question through the new government. Furthermore, Putin would loss his only ally in the Middle-east region what is actually more, a profit provider as Russia could be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Barack Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries and therefore feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria may be described not just as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but also like a conflict on the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure in the Syrian conflict will surely have major impact on both relations between Russia and USA and the way ahead for the center East.