The Importance of Syrian Conflict1951990

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:26, 10 марта 2016; IzoladolxzwajyfCatalino (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «In the ongoing conflict in Syria involving the Bashar Al-Assad forces and the rebel army it could have already been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

In the ongoing conflict in Syria involving the Bashar Al-Assad forces and the rebel army it could have already been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of the very crucial cases to the world. Both Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama make their points in showing that it is in their countries interests some thing. Therefore, it poses the question why the situation in Syria is really very important to Russia as well as the U . s ..


Firstly, it can be worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - They have entry to Mediterranean Sea and it is in the center of four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The initial a couple of them have hostile relations especially beneath the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is situated between those countries and Iran is their strongest ally in the Middle East, which make them a really strategically located country. The last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively all-around Syria. The most important thing, is destabilization of Syria along with the great number of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly from the rebel army) could have affect situation in those regions (Kuwait - that's essential since it continues to be the 4th biggest oil exporter to the USA in last 20 years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, which may have already causing problems due to activity of the company's extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization and increase of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, who are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic curiosity about the very center east) can be extremely interested in the syrian crisis charity. Barack Obama feels more pressure than normal in the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government that is supporting the rebel army in the first place), who emphasize the specter of Iran for the whole Middle East. The other, very important aspect may be the power over the med Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Soviet Union and Syrian governments can be basically named as the only opposition to USA/NATO domination within the Mediterranean and beyond. In the event of failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the existence of Russian base could be put under question by the new government. Furthermore, Putin would loss his only ally within the Middle-east region and what's more, an income provider as Russia may be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Barack Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries thereby feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria might be described not simply as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but in addition as a conflict over the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure with the Syrian conflict will certainly have major affect both relations between Russia and USA as well as the way forward for the very center East.