The need for Syrian Conflict7145522

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:27, 10 марта 2016; EdisonnocveaelrqKecker (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Throughout the ongoing conflict in Syria involving the Bashar Al-Assad forces along with the rebel army it could possibly have been observed that "Syrian conflict…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Throughout the ongoing conflict in Syria involving the Bashar Al-Assad forces along with the rebel army it could possibly have been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of the very most crucial cases for your world. Both Vladimir Putin and Obama are making their points in showing it's in their countries interests to behave. Therefore, it poses the question why your situation in Syria can be so very important to Russia and the United States of America.


Firstly, it really is worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It's entry to Mediterranean Sea and it is in the Middle of four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The very first 2 of them have hostile relations and especially within the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is found between those countries and Iran is strongest ally in the centre East, which will make them an incredibly strategically located country. The very last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively close to Syria. The most important thing, is that destabilization of Syria along with the large number of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly make up the rebel army) could have impact on situation in those regions (Kuwait - that is extremely important mainly because it may be the final biggest oil exporter to the USA in last 15 years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, who have already causing problems because of the activity of its extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization while increasing of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, that are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic fascination with the center east) can be extremely concerned with the syrian refugees charity. Obama feels a lot of pressure from the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government that's supporting the rebel army in the first place), who emphasize the specter of Iran for the whole Middle East. The other, important aspect may be the control over the Mediterranean Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Ussr and Syrian governments might be basically named as the only opposition to USA/NATO domination in the Mediterranean Sea. In the case of failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the presence of Russian base could be put under question through the new government. In addition, Putin would loss his only ally in the Middle-east region what is more, a return provider as Russia is the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Barack Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries and therefore feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria could be described not merely as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but in addition like a conflict over the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure in the Syrian conflict will surely have major influence on both relations between Russia and USA and the way forward for the Middle East.