The need for Syrian Conflict1422009

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:29, 10 марта 2016; LaylaaidzizygmaMasteller (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Through the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces as well as the rebel army it might have already been observed that "Syrian conflict"…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Through the ongoing conflict in Syria relating to the Bashar Al-Assad forces as well as the rebel army it might have already been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of the most crucial cases for that world. Both Vladimir Putin and Obama have made their points in showing it's in their countries interests to behave. Therefore, it poses the issue why the specific situation in Syria can be so essential for Russia and also the United states.


Firstly, it can be worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It has use of Mediterranean and beyond which is during four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The initial a pair of them have hostile relations and especially beneath the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is located between those countries and Iran is their strongest ally at the center East, which make them an extremely situated near commercial establishments country. The final two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near Syria. What is important, is that destabilization of Syria along with the great number of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly form the rebel army) may have affect situation in those regions (Kuwait - which can be vitally important since it may be your fourth biggest oil exporter for your USA in last 15 years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, who have already causing problems because of the activity of their extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization while increasing of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, who are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic curiosity about the guts east) can be extremely interested in the syrian crisis charity. Obama feels more pressure than normal from the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government that's supporting the rebel army in the first place), who emphasize the specter of Iran for the entire Middle East. The 2nd, very important aspect is the control of the med Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Soviet Union and Syrian governments might be basically named because the only opposition to USA/NATO domination on the Mediterranean and beyond. In the event of failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the existence of Russian base could be put under question with the new government. Moreover, Putin would loss his only ally from the Middle-east region and what is more, a profit provider as Russia could be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries and therefore feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria might be described not simply as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but additionally as a conflict on the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure from the Syrian conflict will surely have major effect on both relations between Russia and USA along with the desolate man the center East.