The significance of Syrian Conflict7901513

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:30, 10 марта 2016; DanniellevmywyqrgdmSimkowitz (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «In the ongoing conflict in Syria between the Bashar Al-Assad forces along with the rebel army it may have been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of t…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

In the ongoing conflict in Syria between the Bashar Al-Assad forces along with the rebel army it may have been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of the very crucial cases for the world. Both Vladimir Putin and Obama made their points in showing that it's inside their countries interests some thing. Therefore, it poses the question why the specific situation in Syria is so essential for Russia and also the United States of America.


Firstly, it can be worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - They have use of Mediterranean Sea and it is during four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The very first 2 of them have hostile relations and especially underneath the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is situated between those countries and Iran could be the strongest ally in the center East, that make them an incredibly strategically located country. The last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near to Syria. What is important, is always that destabilization of Syria along with the large numbers of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly from the rebel army) could possibly have effect on situation in those regions (Kuwait - which is extremely important since it continues to be the final biggest oil exporter to the USA in last many years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, which have already causing problems due to the activity of their extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization and increase of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, that are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic fascination with the guts east) are extremely concerned with the help syria. Obama feels a lot of pressure through the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government which is supporting the rebel army right away), who emphasize the specter of Iran for the complete Middle East. The 2nd, essential aspect is the power over the Mediterranean Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Ussr and Syrian governments could be basically named since the only opposition to USA/NATO domination in the Mediterranean and beyond. In the event of failure of Bashar Al-Assad, a good Russian base might be put under question by the new government. Additionally, Putin would loss his only ally inside the Middle-east region what is more, a return provider as Russia will be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Barack Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries and so feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria could be described not simply as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but also as being a conflict within the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure from the Syrian conflict is sure to have major effect on both relations between Russia and USA and also the desolate man the center East.