The significance of Syrian Conflict3967217

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:38, 10 марта 2016; SebastianzatpaipcfhProvins (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «During the ongoing conflict in Syria between your Bashar Al-Assad forces and the rebel army it may have been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of the…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

During the ongoing conflict in Syria between your Bashar Al-Assad forces and the rebel army it may have been observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of the most crucial cases for the world. Both Vladimir Putin and Obama are making their points in showing that it is inside their countries interests to act. Therefore, it poses the question why the specific situation in Syria can be so important for Russia as well as the Usa.


Firstly, it really is worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It's got use of Mediterranean Sea and is during four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The initial a couple of them have hostile relations and particularly beneath the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is located between those countries and Iran is the strongest ally in the centre East, which can make them a really strategically located country. The last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near Syria. What's important, is destabilization of Syria as well as the large number of Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly form the rebel army) could have influence on situation in those regions (Kuwait - which can be very important because it has become the fourth biggest oil exporter for that USA in last fifteen years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, who have already causing problems as a result of activity of its extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization while increasing of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, that are actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic curiosity about the Middle east) can be extremely worried about the sponsor an orphan syria. Barack Obama feels a lot of pressure from the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government which is supporting the rebel army from the beginning), who emphasize the specter of Iran for the complete Middle East. The next, very essential aspect is the power over the med Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Soviet Union and Syrian governments could be basically named because only opposition to USA/NATO domination on the Mediterranean and beyond. In case of failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the presence of Russian base could possibly be put under question by the new government. Additionally, Putin would loss his only ally from the Middle-east region and what's more, money provider as Russia may be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries thereby feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria might be described not merely as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, and also being a conflict over the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure of the Syrian conflict is sure to have major impact on both relations between Russia and USA and also the way forward for the guts East.