The need for Syrian Conflict3162539

Материал из megapuper
Версия от 17:39, 10 марта 2016; PhuongcuwbgtvzckVanbelle (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Through the ongoing conflict in Syria between the Bashar Al-Assad forces and also the rebel army it could happen to be observed that "Syrian conflict" has become…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

Through the ongoing conflict in Syria between the Bashar Al-Assad forces and also the rebel army it could happen to be observed that "Syrian conflict" has become one of the very most crucial cases for the world. Both Vladimir Putin and Barack Obama have made their points in showing it is in their countries interests some thing. Therefore, it poses the issue why the situation in Syria can be so very important to Russia along with the United States of America.


Firstly, it really is worth mentioning the strategic geographical and political location of Syria - It has access to Mediterranean and beyond and it is during four important countries/regions: Israel, Iran, Kuwait and Caucasian states. The initial a pair of them have hostile relations and particularly within the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the conflict seemed very plausible. Syria is situated between those countries and Iran is strongest ally in the center East, which will make them an extremely strategically located country. The very last two countries, Kuwait and Caucasian states are relatively near Syria. What is important, is destabilization of Syria as well as the many Islamic extremist mercenaries (who partly make up the rebel army) could possibly have impact on situation in those regions (Kuwait - that's essential since it has been your fourth biggest oil exporter for that USA in last fifteen years) and former Soviet Caucasian states, which have already causing problems due to activity of the extremist groups. Hence, both Russians (avoiding destabilization while increasing of influence of extremist groups in Caucasian states - mostly Chechen groups, who're actually Muslim) and USA (supporting Israel against Iran and protecting their economic fascination with the very center east) are really interested in the sponsor an orphan syria. Barack Obama feels a lot of pressure in the Israeli government (and apparently the Kuwait government which is supporting the rebel army in the first place), who emphasize the threat of Iran for the entire Middle East. The 2nd, very important aspect may be the control of the Mediterranean Sea. The Russian Naval Base in Tartus established in 1971 under agreement of Soviet Union and Syrian governments may be basically named as the only opposition to USA/NATO domination over the Mediterranean and beyond. In case there is failure of Bashar Al-Assad, the use of Russian base could possibly be put under question by the new government. Furthermore, Putin would loss his only ally within the Middle-east region what is actually more, a return provider as Russia will be the biggest exporter of weaponry for Syria. Lastly, Obama follows the ideological superiority of USA over other countries thereby feels obligated to intervene in Syria. The conflict in Syria can be described not merely as conflict between Al-Assad and rebel forces, but in addition as being a conflict on the diplomatic domination between Putin and Obama. Every possible closure from the Syrian conflict will certainly have major affect both relations between Russia and USA along with the desolate man the Middle East.