FireAdamHill8455570

Who`s DumpAdamHill2016? Could it be Cal Coast "News"? (It's obviously their only allegation source.) Is it an angry conservative radio host? Can it be a challenger running for Adam Hill's seat for the SLO Board of Supervisors? Could it be an over-paid political consultant justifying their fee by beating dead and disproved horses? Should it be a hyper-partisan self-promoter who wishes to stay relevant by way of relentlessly pointing for the same, single attack piece before ice caps melt? Unfortunately we cannot know. I am not sure. Mainly because is definitely true with others such as this, they get rid of an accusation, then run and conceal so they can't be cross-examined. It is exactly what they are doing. They are commemorate them smart. They believe it makes them strong.

It's the strut of insecurity. It's the ploy of the snake oil salesman. ... or maybe it does not take Internet Conspiracist Community equivalent of posing with an AR-15 and trying to look "bad-ass" for that camera. They hide behind machines to reduce off all debate. Whether someone hides behind a gun or moniker on the Internet, it's the same mentality: they're scared of an actual debate simply because they know they'll lose. I, however, tend not to hide. I'm Paul from poliARC. I'm a politically-incorrect-liberal-nobody who thinks grammar is a ruse. Company, Also i do web and print design help Supervisor Adam Hill. While doing that work well I came across this "DumpAdamHill2016" video on-line, and noticed that not simply will be the staging and content shameful fibbery, nonetheless they didn't register the domain they place in their pseudo PAC ad. (Since 12/14/2015, the "committee" isn't registered anywhere I really could easily discover, either.) And so i bought the domain and posted this little public shaming rant about the off-chance it will be read before they pull along the video or affect the name. I'm carrying this out without any help dime being a SLO County resident driven with the principle with the issue. Just like the majority of individuals who are now living in America, I'm sick and tired with the "truth is optional" crowd controlling the dialog when all they actually do is create problems and sledgehammer our body in to a junior high game of I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I because they shout "LALALALALA" with hands covering their ears whenever facts scale the walls of the well-padded digital playground. It is not about whether someone supports a politician or otherwise. My working for Hill is irrelevant to the stage (needless to say, I doubt these individuals are able to embrace that concept... they're more the clutching type2). I'm referencing the whole process of modern right-wing dissension and community interaction. This is about how exactly people that shout the loudest and point fingers the most do this while hiding in online burrows, or while crouched in fact-blocking bunkers of bravado-buttressed belief. Their contribution to the political dialog could be the equal of teenage boys spraypainting YOU SUCK on the locker and giggling their way back to the comment section clubhouse, pining to get a thumbs as whether it were a centerfold. I don't care if you'd prefer or hate Adam Hill. I care which you throw outlandish claims from behind a mask. And also to anyone whose default rebuttal argument against anything in which you disagree is, "Biassed!": you should be shaming these people as well. If you not pay attention to me because you think I'm biased... then you can't hear FireAdamHill.com either. We know nothing relating to this person except their crass bias against Adam Hill. Thumbs down for cowardice. To DumpAdamHill2016, a party's invitation: it's time to stop hiding behind handles and aliases. Step beyond your echo chamber. This is not some national campaign: everyone knows the other person for screaming loud! Tiny pond! (Not many fish.) Everyone knows that is either the riled-up, self-declared foe who used the same name-based SEO tactics last election, or the steadfast population group in SLO County who've had fire Adam Hill within their sights for years. Everything bottled-up anger sourced from your vine planted the day he muted a microphone... ...because (much like the everybody else) he felt it was no more socially acceptable to subject The People towards the off-topic, outlandish and frequently abusive rantings throughout a BOS public comment. A democrat finally took a stand up against the Noise that particular day, and boy howdy made it happen allow you to angry... it made Adam Hill your white whale. And you have hunted him since. If you aren't this stubborn group who would rather hate: set the record straight and tell us your name. I welcome being wrong, and that i love an excellent debate, but I'm darn sick and tired of masked accusations created by people they cannot sign their particular name to some claim... ...and I'm damn fed up with always being right.