FireAdamHill1822520

That`s DumpAdamHill2016? Can it be Cal Coast "News"? (It's obviously their only allegation source.) Could it be an angry conservative radio host? Is it a challenger running for Adam Hill's seat on the SLO Board of Supervisors? Is it an over-paid political consultant justifying their fee by beating dead and disproved horses? Should it be a hyper-partisan self-promoter who wishes to stay relevant by means of relentlessly pointing on the same, single attack piece before the ice caps melt? And we don't know. I'm not sure. Because is always the truth with folks like this, they toss an accusation, then run and hide so that they is not cross-examined. That's what they do. Believe that celebrate them smart. They believe commemorate them strong.

Oahu is the strut of insecurity. Oahu is the ploy of the snake oil salesman. ... or maybe it's the Internet Conspiracist Community equal of posing having an AR-15 and looking to take a look "bad-ass" for your camera. They hide behind machines to chop off all debate. Whether somebody hides behind a gun or moniker on the web, it does not take same mentality: they're scared of a genuine debate since they know they'll lose. I, however, usually do not hide. I will be Paul from poliARC. I'm a politically-incorrect-liberal-nobody who thinks grammar is often a ruse. And yes, I additionally do web and print design benefit Supervisor Adam Hill. While doing that really work I discovered this "DumpAdamHill2016" video on Youtube, and remarked that not just may be the staging and content shameful fibbery, however they didn't register the domain installed in their own personal pseudo PAC ad. (As of 12/14/2015, the "committee" isn't registered anywhere I possibly could easily discover, either.) Therefore i bought the domain and posted this little public shaming rant around the off-chance it could be read before they pull along the video or customize the name. I'm achieving this alone dime as being a SLO County resident driven from the principle of the issue. Much like the majority of those who are in America, I'm sick and tired of the "truth is optional" crowd controlling the dialog when all they do is create problems and sledgehammer our body right into a junior high game of I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I since they shout "LALALALALA" with hands covering their ears whenever facts scale the walls of their well-padded digital playground. This is not about whether someone supports a politician or otherwise not. My doing work for Hill is irrelevant to the level (obviously, I doubt these people will be able to embrace that concept... they're more the clutching type2). I'm referencing the entire process of modern right-wing dissension and community interaction. That is regarding how those who shout the loudest and point fingers essentially the most do so while hiding in online burrows, or while crouched in fact-blocking bunkers of bravado-buttressed belief. Their contribution to our political dialog may be the equal of teenage boys spraypainting YOU SUCK on the locker and giggling their way back on the comment section clubhouse, pining for the thumbs as whether it were a centerfold. I would not care if you want or hate Adam Hill. I care that you simply throw outlandish claims from behind a mask. And also to anyone whose default rebuttal argument against anything that you disagree is, "Biassed!": you ought to be shaming they will too. If you not pay attention to me since you think I'm biased... then you can't listen to FireAdamHill.com either. We all know nothing about this person except their crass bias against Adam Hill. Thumbs down for cowardice. To DumpAdamHill2016, a party invitation: you need to stop hiding behind handles and aliases. Step outside the echo chamber. It is not some national campaign: we all know the other person for screaming loud! Tiny pond! (Very few fish.) Everyone knows this is either the riled-up, self-declared foe who used the same name-based SEO tactics last election, or perhaps the steadfast population group in SLO County who've had Fire Adam Hill video within their sights for many years. All of that bottled-up anger sourced in the vine planted the day he muted a microphone... ...because (much like the everybody else) he felt it turned out will no longer socially acceptable to subject People for the off-topic, outlandish and quite often abusive rantings during a BOS public comment. A democrat finally took a stand contrary to the Noise on that day, and boy howdy did it cause you to be angry... it made Adam Hill your white whale. And you have hunted him from the time. If you are not this stubborn group who likes to hate: set the record straight and reveal your name. I welcome being wrong, and i also love an excellent debate, but I'm darn fed up with masked accusations produced by people too small to sign their own name to some claim... ...that i'm damn tired of always being right.